This NPR radio spot confirms much of what we already know about struggle. There’s so much good stuff in this report, I’d encourage you to go listen to it or read it. Here are a couple nuggets I found particularly illuminating (emphasis mine).

=================

For example, Stigler says, in the Japanese classrooms that he’s studied,

teachers consciously design tasks that are slightly beyond the capabilities of the students they teach, so the students can actually experience struggling with something just outside their reach. Then, once the task is mastered, theteachers actively point out that the student was able to accomplish it through hard work and struggle.“And I just think that especially in schools, we don’t create enough of those experiences, and then we don’t point them out clearly enough.”

…

“We did a study many years ago with first-grade students,” he tells me. “We decided to go out and give the students an impossible math problem to work on, and then we would measure how long they worked on it before they gave up.”

The American students “worked on it less than 30 seconds on average and then they basically looked at us and said, ‘We haven’t had this,’ ” he says.

But the

Japanese students worked for the entire hour on the impossible problem. “And finally we had to stop the session because the hour was up. And then we had to debrief them and say, ‘Oh, that was not a possible problem; that was an impossible problem!’ and they looked at us like, ‘What kind of animals are we?’ ” Stigler recalls.“Think about that [kind of behavior] spread over a lifetime,” he says. “That’s a big difference.”

…

*Great*, teachers say,* I know students learn from struggling through a complex problem, but my kids won’t do that. They won’t participate in productive struggle. They don’t come pre-loaded with productive struggle software. Therefore, the thinking goes, I need to address the kids where they’re at in terms of willing to struggle through a task.*

Talk to any math teacher, and one of their frustrations will no doubt be that students give up too quickly on a complex problem. Mathematics is unique among all subject areas in its potential for cultivating a positive attitude toward struggle. It’s also the subject that tends to shut kids down for that very reason.

In other words, it’s a struggle to get kids willing to struggle.

And it’s one we need to struggle through.

Teachers, particularly math teachers, know that most learning occurs in the midst of struggle and overcoming struggle. But all students’ life they’ve been assessed and encouraged to solve rote problems quickly. How can we undo years of low-complexity problems? How might we develop students’ desire, ability, and disposition to struggle? What should students be doing? What should teachers be doing? What kind of tasks should kids be engaged with to encourage positive struggle behavior?

Even though dubbing this the “East” vs. “West” mindset is lazy terminology, it does conjure up a sort of **spectrum of student and teacher attitude toward struggle**. How can we nudge students (and teachers) a bit eastward on the spectrum? What kinds of tasks can we provide for kids so they may learn persistence.

* – “My Favorite No” refers to this video from TeachingChannel.org.

** – “The Mistake Game” refers to this post from Kelly O’Shea.

While, as the article cited suggests, I hate to place a value judgment on the East-West mindsets presented. That said, I don’t think we’re particularly lacking of Western-style classrooms. Do you have particular tasks that help kids get away from a Western attitude toward struggle and smarts? Even if it nudges kids just a bit further “eastward”, please share. Because we all know that struggling and persisting are good things, but we’re not always sure on how to engage students in this manner.

Lots of great points brought up here.

You mentioned, “Teachers, particularly math teachers, know that most learning occurs in the midst of struggle and overcoming struggle.” I would modify the first part to something like “most [valuable and life-long] learning occurs in the midst of struggle and overcoming struggle.” Also, I am not as confident that “Teachers, particularly math teacher, know that.” For some teachers it is a hard sell to convince them that students benefit from struggle. I think part of this comes from the way we assess students on standardized tests.

Thinking about the concept of slope as an example, I can teach students how to use rise over run to find the slope of a line in one class period. To people who just look at test scores they seem proficient without enduring much struggle. However, this is an shallow procedural understanding that is quickly forgotten. Conversely, if you teach slope by having students build conceptual understanding of what slope is, it will be a longer lesson with more struggle and standardized test scores may not be any higher. As such, the benefit of adding struggle to a lesson is not immediately clear.

I am not sure if you have read this article (http://timssvideo.com/sites/default/files/A%20World%20of%20Difference.pdf) but Stigler goes into some of his ideas of what to do to improve the situation.

As for your final question, “Do you have particular tasks that help kids get away from a Western attitude toward struggle and smarts?”, I agree with you that problem-based learning is a way to help give students something they feel is worth the struggle. The math conversations and learning that come out of perplexing problems have been very validating for the time it takes to prepare them.

Reblogged this on Principal Sinclair's Think-Spot and commented:

Interesting read and ideas

Reblogged this on What Else? 1DR and commented:

Struggle. Guiding students to shine their own light at the end of the tunnel.

Pingback: Struggle and Mindsets « What Else? 1DR

Pingback: Rigor, Relevance & GPA « the radical rational…

There’s an excellent book that if you have not yet read, you should by Magdalene Lampert called “Teaching Problems and the Problems of Teaching.” Lampert reflects on a year’s teaching 5th grade math wherein she presents students with problems first, and then uses class discussions and journaling around those problems to help students come to an understanding of some fairly rich mathematical ideas. I’m going to recommend this approach to our elementary school staff.

What I took away from this book though was that Lampert was largely successful in the year she had her students in changing their perspective around what it is to learn mathematics. I think that you can do the same thing with any group of students, although it is probably easier with younger students.

Thanks for the book recommendation, David! Adding it to my ever-growing list of longreads. — Geoff

This is a great post that brings together some ideas that I’ve been trying to find a clear way to state. Would you be interested in sharing on the Productive Struggle blog? It’s brand new and we’re looking to spark the exact conversation you’re starting here: productivestruggle.wordpress.com

Hi Tina, I’d be happy to share on the blog. It looks like it’s off to a great start! What exactly would you like me to share? — Geoff

Reblogged this on Productive Struggle.

Pingback: What is Productive Struggle? | starksj

Reblogged on starksj.wordpress.com

Hey Geoff,

Was wondering if you have seen the research by Hiroko Kawaguchi Warshauer entitled “Productive struggle in middle school mathematics classrooms”. INCREDIBLY interesting read and wanted to see if you have seen any other resources like this out there- or blogs, or people, or protocols, etc… http://bit.ly/1cQcvt0. By the way, used your latest post on test prep with my math people- totally awesome.