It’s probably not exactly the Great Double Stuf Oreo Controversy of 2013. We’ll be bouncing our grandchildren on our knees talking about that one. But here I am with some Reduced Fat ‘Nilla Wafers, thinking about multiplying percents and fractions.
Rest assured, I purchased these on accident. I meant to get the Original Wafers in all their full-fatted glory, like so:
Poor stage lighting aside, I want to do something with this, but I’m sort of facing decision paralysis. There are so many great models of Problem-Based Learning or Problem Solving Tasks, it’s difficult for me to settle on one, so I’ll just go ahead and create them all and see what sticks.
Would you rather eat 5 Reduced Fat Wafers or 2 original Wafers?
Multiple Choice
Here is a plate of original ‘Nilla Wafers.
Which of these Reduced Fat ‘Nilla Wafers plates has less fat in total?
Multiple Choice: You Make up the Question
Here are a bunch of pictures of ‘Nilla Wafers (original and Reduced Fat). Make up a multiple choice question & answer key.
Gamifying: Really strange playing cards
The point is, I’ve been trying to be less myopic when it comes to PrBL. There are so many great, differentiated models of Problem-Based Learning, I think it would be silly to get sucked into one and one alone. While I do think there is power in iterative routines, such as using a relatively consistent problem solving framework, it would be silly to neglect the power of “Any Questions” or the “Know/Need-to-Know” processes.
Going a bit further, the lines between the task vs. the scaffolding vs. the assessment are probably best when blurred. Considering just these wafers, we could probably place them in any of these three slots.
But alas, here I am, back to my decision paralysis. I suppose it’s a good problem to have.
emergent math 