Reduced Fat ‘Nilla Wafers are an Empty Canvas for Problem-Based Learning Models

It’s probably not exactly the Great Double Stuf Oreo Controversy of 2013. We’ll be bouncing our grandchildren on our knees talking about that one. But here I am with some Reduced Fat ‘Nilla Wafers, thinking about multiplying percents and fractions.

IMG_4176

IMG_4177

Rest assured, I purchased these on accident. I meant to get the Original Wafers in all their full-fatted glory, like so:

IMG_4168

Poor stage lighting aside, I want to do something with this, but I’m sort of facing decision paralysis. There are so many great models of Problem-Based Learning or Problem Solving Tasks, it’s difficult for me to settle on one, so I’ll just go ahead and create them all and see what sticks.

Would You Rather

Would you rather eat 5 Reduced Fat Wafers or 2 original Wafers?

IMG_4176IMG_4169

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Multiple Choice

Here is a plate of original ‘Nilla Wafers.

IMG_4169

Which of these Reduced Fat ‘Nilla Wafers plates has less fat in total?

IMG_4171 IMG_4173 IMG_4174 IMG_4175 IMG_4176

Multiple Choice: You Make up the Question

Here are a bunch of pictures of ‘Nilla Wafers (original and Reduced Fat). Make up a multiple choice question & answer key.

Gamifying: Really strange playing cards


The point is, I’ve been trying to be less myopic when it comes to PrBL. There are so many great, differentiated models of Problem-Based Learning, I think it would be silly to get sucked into one and one alone. While I do think there is power in iterative routines, such as using a relatively consistent problem solving framework, it would be silly to neglect the power of “Any Questions” or the “Know/Need-to-Know” processes.

Going a bit further, the lines between the task vs. the scaffolding vs. the assessment are probably best when blurred. Considering just these wafers, we could probably place them in any of these three slots.

nilla spots

 

But alas, here I am, back to my decision paralysis. I suppose it’s a good problem to have.

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Reduced Fat ‘Nilla Wafers are an Empty Canvas for Problem-Based Learning Models

  1. howardat58 says:

    Many questions arise here
    Are the low fat ones the same size as the regular ones?
    What is a unit of fat, and does the size of the unit matter?
    Do they taste the same?
    Are you aiming for a quantitative interest in the subject, or wanting to push the problem towards a specific method? in other words, Have you decided that this WILL be about fractions, etc.?
    What if Johnny says – “Let’s say that the regulars have 100 units of fat each, then the reduced ones have 40 each” – and reduces the problem to simple arithmetic?
    Also, what about the sugar content? Unless we are in the Splenda Zone.
    Finally, half of 12 is 6 and one third of 6 is 2, so one third of one half of 12 is 2, which is one sixth.
    So one third times one half is one sixth, and not just of 12 !!!

  2. Kelly says:

    A really interesting question here would be to not only compare fat grams but also compare calories. If I remember correctly (I looked at these reduced fat and regular fat wafers recently), the reduced fat wafers actually are higher in calories than the full-fat version. You could have rather intriguing comparisons and arguments if you compare the gain/reduction of calories and fat grams and vice versa.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s